Logistic regression - overview
This page offers structured overviews of one or more selected methods. Add additional methods for comparisons (max. of 3) by clicking on the dropdown button in the right-hand column. To practice with a specific method click the button at the bottom row of the table
Logistic regression | Friedman test | McNemar's test |
You cannot compare more than 3 methods |
---|---|---|---|
Independent variables | Independent/grouping variable | Independent variable | |
One or more quantitative of interval or ratio level and/or one or more categorical with independent groups, transformed into code variables | One within subject factor ($\geq 2$ related groups) | 2 paired groups | |
Dependent variable | Dependent variable | Dependent variable | |
One categorical with 2 independent groups | One of ordinal level | One categorical with 2 independent groups | |
Null hypothesis | Null hypothesis | Null hypothesis | |
Model chi-squared test for the complete regression model:
| H0: the population scores in any of the related groups are not systematically higher or lower than the population scores in any of the other related groups
Usually the related groups are the different measurement points. Several different formulations of the null hypothesis can be found in the literature, and we do not agree with all of them. Make sure you (also) learn the one that is given in your text book or by your teacher. | Let's say that the scores on the dependent variable are scored 0 and 1. Then for each pair of scores, the data allow four options:
Other formulations of the null hypothesis are:
| |
Alternative hypothesis | Alternative hypothesis | Alternative hypothesis | |
Model chi-squared test for the complete regression model:
| H1: the population scores in some of the related groups are systematically higher or lower than the population scores in other related groups | The alternative hypothesis H1 is that for each pair of scores, P(first score of pair is 0 while second score of pair is 1) $\neq$ P(first score of pair is 1 while second score of pair is 0). That is, the probability that a pair of scores switches from 0 to 1 is not the same as the probability that a pair of scores switches from 1 to 0. Other formulations of the alternative hypothesis are:
| |
Assumptions | Assumptions | Assumptions | |
|
|
| |
Test statistic | Test statistic | Test statistic | |
Model chi-squared test for the complete regression model:
The wald statistic can be defined in two ways:
Likelihood ratio chi-squared test for individual $\beta_k$:
| $Q = \dfrac{12}{N \times k(k + 1)} \sum R^2_i - 3 \times N(k + 1)$
Here $N$ is the number of 'blocks' (usually the subjects - so if you have 4 repeated measurements for 60 subjects, $N$ equals 60), $k$ is the number of related groups (usually the number of repeated measurements), and $R_i$ is the sum of ranks in group $i$. Remember that multiplication precedes addition, so first compute $\frac{12}{N \times k(k + 1)} \times \sum R^2_i$ and then subtract $3 \times N(k + 1)$. Note: if ties are present in the data, the formula for $Q$ is more complicated. | $X^2 = \dfrac{(b - c)^2}{b + c}$
Here $b$ is the number of pairs in the sample for which the first score is 0 while the second score is 1, and $c$ is the number of pairs in the sample for which the first score is 1 while the second score is 0. | |
Sampling distribution of $X^2$ and of the Wald statistic if H0 were true | Sampling distribution of $Q$ if H0 were true | Sampling distribution of $X^2$ if H0 were true | |
Sampling distribution of $X^2$, as computed in the model chi-squared test for the complete model:
| If the number of blocks $N$ is large, approximately the chi-squared distribution with $k - 1$ degrees of freedom.
For small samples, the exact distribution of $Q$ should be used. | If $b + c$ is large enough (say, > 20), approximately the chi-squared distribution with 1 degree of freedom. If $b + c$ is small, the Binomial($n$, $P$) distribution should be used, with $n = b + c$ and $P = 0.5$. In that case the test statistic becomes equal to $b$. | |
Significant? | Significant? | Significant? | |
For the model chi-squared test for the complete regression model and likelihood ratio chi-squared test for individual $\beta_k$:
| If the number of blocks $N$ is large, the table with critical $X^2$ values can be used. If we denote $X^2 = Q$:
| For test statistic $X^2$:
| |
Wald-type approximate $C\%$ confidence interval for $\beta_k$ | n.a. | n.a. | |
$b_k \pm z^* \times SE_{b_k}$ where the critical value $z^*$ is the value under the normal curve with the area $C / 100$ between $-z^*$ and $z^*$ (e.g. $z^*$ = 1.96 for a 95% confidence interval). | - | - | |
Goodness of fit measure $R^2_L$ | n.a. | n.a. | |
$R^2_L = \dfrac{D_{null} - D_K}{D_{null}}$ There are several other goodness of fit measures in logistic regression. In logistic regression, there is no single agreed upon measure of goodness of fit. | - | - | |
n.a. | n.a. | Equivalent to | |
- | - |
| |
Example context | Example context | Example context | |
Can body mass index, stress level, and gender predict whether people get diagnosed with diabetes? | Is there a difference in depression level between measurement point 1 (pre-intervention), measurement point 2 (1 week post-intervention), and measurement point 3 (6 weeks post-intervention)? | Does a tv documentary about spiders change whether people are afraid (yes/no) of spiders? | |
SPSS | SPSS | SPSS | |
Analyze > Regression > Binary Logistic...
| Analyze > Nonparametric Tests > Legacy Dialogs > K Related Samples...
| Analyze > Nonparametric Tests > Legacy Dialogs > 2 Related Samples...
| |
Jamovi | Jamovi | Jamovi | |
Regression > 2 Outcomes - Binomial
| ANOVA > Repeated Measures ANOVA - Friedman
| Frequencies > Paired Samples - McNemar test
| |
Practice questions | Practice questions | Practice questions | |