McNemar's test overview

This page offers structured overviews of one or more selected methods. Add additional methods for comparisons (max. of 3) by clicking on the dropdown button in the right-hand column. To practice with a specific method click the button at the bottom row of the table

McNemar's test	Cochran's Q test	Binomial test for a single proportion $z$ test for a single proportion $z$ test for the difference between two proportions Goodness of fit test Chi-squared test for the relationship between two categorical variables One sample $z$ test for the mean One sample $t$ test for the mean Paired sample $t$ test Two sample $z$ test Two sample $t$ test - equal variances not assumed Two sample $t$ test - equal variances assumed One way ANOVA Two way ANOVA Pearson correlation Regression (OLS)Logistic regression Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon test Kruskal-Wallis test Sign test McNemar's test Cochran's Q test Marginal Homogeneity test / Stuart-Maxwell test Friedman test Wilcoxon signed-rank test One sample Wilcoxon signed-rank test Spearman's rho
Independent variable	Independent/grouping variable
2 paired groups	One within subject factor ($\geq 2$ related groups)
Dependent variable	Dependent variable
One categorical with 2 independent groups	One categorical with 2 independent groups
Null hypothesis	Null hypothesis
Let's say that the scores on the dependent variable are scored 0 and 1. Then for each pair of scores, the data allow four options: First score of pair is 0, second score of pair is 0 First score of pair is 0, second score of pair is 1 (switched) First score of pair is 1, second score of pair is 0 (switched) First score of pair is 1, second score of pair is 1 The null hypothesis H₀ is that for each pair of scores, P(first score of pair is 0 while second score of pair is 1) = P(first score of pair is 1 while second score of pair is 0). That is, the probability that a pair of scores switches from 0 to 1 is the same as the probability that a pair of scores switches from 1 to 0. Other formulations of the null hypothesis are: H₀: $\pi_1 = \pi_2$, where $\pi_1$ is the population proportion of ones for the first paired group and $\pi_2$ is the population proportion of ones for the second paired group H₀: for each pair of scores, P(first score of pair is 1) = P(second score of pair is 1)	H₀: $\pi_1 = \pi_2 = \ldots = \pi_I$ Here $\pi_1$ is the population proportion of 'successes' for group 1, $\pi_2$ is the population proportion of 'successes' for group 2, and $\pi_I$ is the population proportion of 'successes' for group $I.$
Alternative hypothesis	Alternative hypothesis
The alternative hypothesis H₁ is that for each pair of scores, P(first score of pair is 0 while second score of pair is 1) $\neq$ P(first score of pair is 1 while second score of pair is 0). That is, the probability that a pair of scores switches from 0 to 1 is not the same as the probability that a pair of scores switches from 1 to 0. Other formulations of the alternative hypothesis are: H₁: $\pi_1 \neq \pi_2$ H₁: for each pair of scores, P(first score of pair is 1) $\neq$ P(second score of pair is 1)	H₁: not all population proportions are equal
Assumptions	Assumptions
Sample of pairs is a simple random sample from the population of pairs. That is, pairs are independent of one another	Sample of 'blocks' (usually the subjects) is a simple random sample from the population. That is, blocks are independent of one another
Test statistic	Test statistic
$X^2 = \dfrac{(b - c)^2}{b + c}$ Here $b$ is the number of pairs in the sample for which the first score is 0 while the second score is 1, and $c$ is the number of pairs in the sample for which the first score is 1 while the second score is 0.	If a failure is scored as 0 and a success is scored as 1: $Q = k(k - 1) \dfrac{\sum_{groups} \Big (\mbox{group total} - \frac{\mbox{grand total}}{k} \Big)^2}{\sum_{blocks} \mbox{block total} \times (k - \mbox{block total})}$ Here $k$ is the number of related groups (usually the number of repeated measurements), a group total is the sum of the scores in a group, a block total is the sum of the scores in a block (usually a subject), and the grand total is the sum of all the scores. Before computing $Q$, first exclude blocks with equal scores in all $k$ groups.
Sampling distribution of $X^2$ if H₀ were true	Sampling distribution of $Q$ if H₀ were true
If $b + c$ is large enough (say, > 20), approximately the chi-squared distribution with 1 degree of freedom. If $b + c$ is small, the Binomial($n$, $P$) distribution should be used, with $n = b + c$ and $P = 0.5$. In that case the test statistic becomes equal to $b$.	If the number of blocks (usually the number of subjects) is large, approximately the chi-squared distribution with $k - 1$ degrees of freedom
Significant?	Significant?
For test statistic $X^2$: Check if $X^2$ observed in sample is equal to or larger than critical value $X^{2*}$ or Find $p$ value corresponding to observed $X^2$ and check if it is equal to or smaller than $\alpha$ If $b + c$ is small, the table for the binomial distribution should be used, with as test statistic $b$: Check if $b$ observed in sample is in the rejection region or Find two sided $p$ value corresponding to observed $b$ and check if it is equal to or smaller than $\alpha$	If the number of blocks is large, the table with critical $X^2$ values can be used. If we denote $X^2 = Q$: Check if $X^2$ observed in sample is equal to or larger than critical value $X^{2*}$ or Find $p$ value corresponding to observed $X^2$ and check if it is equal to or smaller than $\alpha$
Equivalent to	Equivalent to
Stuart-Maxwell test, with a categorical dependent variable consisting of two independent groups Cochran's Q test, with two related groups Two sided sign test: $b = W$, and $X^2 = z^2$	Friedman test, with a categorical dependent variable consisting of two independent groups.
Example context	Example context
Does a tv documentary about spiders change whether people are afraid (yes/no) of spiders?	Subjects perform three different tasks, which they can either perform correctly or incorrectly. Is there a difference in task performance between the three different tasks?
SPSS	SPSS
Analyze > Nonparametric Tests > Legacy Dialogs > 2 Related Samples... Put the two paired variables in the boxes below Variable 1 and Variable 2 Under Test Type, select the McNemar test	Analyze > Nonparametric Tests > Legacy Dialogs > K Related Samples... Put the $k$ variables containing the scores for the $k$ related groups in the white box below Test Variables Under Test Type, select Cochran's Q test
Jamovi	Jamovi
Frequencies > Paired Samples - McNemar test Put one of the two paired variables in the box below Rows and the other paired variable in the box below Columns	Jamovi does not have a specific option for the Cochran's Q test. However, you can do the Friedman test instead. The $p$ value resulting from this Friedman test is equivalent to the $p$ value that would have resulted from the Cochran's Q test. Go to: ANOVA > Repeated Measures ANOVA - Friedman Put the $k$ variables containing the scores for the $k$ related groups in the box below Measures
Practice questions	Practice questions

McNemar's test - overview