Sign test overview

This page offers structured overviews of one or more selected methods. Add additional methods for comparisons (max. of 3) by clicking on the dropdown button in the right-hand column. To practice with a specific method click the button at the bottom row of the table

Sign test	Cochran's Q test	Chi-squared test for the relationship between two categorical variables
Independent variable	Independent/grouping variable	Independent /column variable
2 paired groups	One within subject factor ($\geq 2$ related groups)	One categorical with $I$ independent groups ($I \geqslant 2$)
Dependent variable	Dependent variable	Dependent /row variable
One of ordinal level	One categorical with 2 independent groups	One categorical with $J$ independent groups ($J \geqslant 2$)
Null hypothesis	Null hypothesis	Null hypothesis
H₀: P(first score of a pair exceeds second score of a pair) = P(second score of a pair exceeds first score of a pair) If the dependent variable is measured on a continuous scale, this can also be formulated as: H₀: the population median of the difference scores is equal to zero A difference score is the difference between the first score of a pair and the second score of a pair.	H₀: $\pi_1 = \pi_2 = \ldots = \pi_I$ Here $\pi_1$ is the population proportion of 'successes' for group 1, $\pi_2$ is the population proportion of 'successes' for group 2, and $\pi_I$ is the population proportion of 'successes' for group $I.$	H₀: there is no association between the row and column variable More precisely, if there are $I$ independent random samples of size $n_i$ from each of $I$ populations, defined by the independent variable: H₀: the distribution of the dependent variable is the same in each of the $I$ populations If there is one random sample of size $N$ from the total population: H₀: the row and column variables are independent
Alternative hypothesis	Alternative hypothesis	Alternative hypothesis
H₁ two sided: P(first score of a pair exceeds second score of a pair) $\neq$ P(second score of a pair exceeds first score of a pair) H₁ right sided: P(first score of a pair exceeds second score of a pair) > P(second score of a pair exceeds first score of a pair) H₁ left sided: P(first score of a pair exceeds second score of a pair) < P(second score of a pair exceeds first score of a pair) If the dependent variable is measured on a continuous scale, this can also be formulated as: H₁ two sided: the population median of the difference scores is different from zero H₁ right sided: the population median of the difference scores is larger than zero H₁ left sided: the population median of the difference scores is smaller than zero	H₁: not all population proportions are equal	H₁: there is an association between the row and column variable More precisely, if there are $I$ independent random samples of size $n_i$ from each of $I$ populations, defined by the independent variable: H₁: the distribution of the dependent variable is not the same in all of the $I$ populations If there is one random sample of size $N$ from the total population: H₁: the row and column variables are dependent
Assumptions	Assumptions	Assumptions
Sample of pairs is a simple random sample from the population of pairs. That is, pairs are independent of one another	Sample of 'blocks' (usually the subjects) is a simple random sample from the population. That is, blocks are independent of one another	Sample size is large enough for $X^2$ to be approximately chi-squared distributed under the null hypothesis. Rule of thumb: 2 $\times$ 2 table: all four expected cell counts are 5 or more Larger than 2 $\times$ 2 tables: average of the expected cell counts is 5 or more, smallest expected cell count is 1 or more There are $I$ independent simple random samples from each of $I$ populations defined by the independent variable, or there is one simple random sample from the total population
Test statistic	Test statistic	Test statistic
$W = $ number of difference scores that is larger than 0	If a failure is scored as 0 and a success is scored as 1: $Q = k(k - 1) \dfrac{\sum_{groups} \Big (\mbox{group total} - \frac{\mbox{grand total}}{k} \Big)^2}{\sum_{blocks} \mbox{block total} \times (k - \mbox{block total})}$ Here $k$ is the number of related groups (usually the number of repeated measurements), a group total is the sum of the scores in a group, a block total is the sum of the scores in a block (usually a subject), and the grand total is the sum of all the scores. Before computing $Q$, first exclude blocks with equal scores in all $k$ groups.	$X^2 = \sum{\frac{(\mbox{observed cell count} - \mbox{expected cell count})^2}{\mbox{expected cell count}}}$ Here for each cell, the expected cell count = $\dfrac{\mbox{row total} \times \mbox{column total}}{\mbox{total sample size}}$, the observed cell count is the observed sample count in that same cell, and the sum is over all $I \times J$ cells.
Sampling distribution of $W$ if H₀ were true	Sampling distribution of $Q$ if H₀ were true	Sampling distribution of $X^2$ if H₀ were true
The exact distribution of $W$ under the null hypothesis is the Binomial($n$, $P$) distribution, with $n =$ number of positive differences $+$ number of negative differences, and $P = 0.5$. If $n$ is large, $W$ is approximately normally distributed under the null hypothesis, with mean $nP = n \times 0.5$ and standard deviation $\sqrt{nP(1-P)} = \sqrt{n \times 0.5(1 - 0.5)}$. Hence, if $n$ is large, the standardized test statistic $$z = \frac{W - n \times 0.5}{\sqrt{n \times 0.5(1 - 0.5)}}$$ follows approximately the standard normal distribution if the null hypothesis were true.	If the number of blocks (usually the number of subjects) is large, approximately the chi-squared distribution with $k - 1$ degrees of freedom	Approximately the chi-squared distribution with $(I - 1) \times (J - 1)$ degrees of freedom
Significant?	Significant?	Significant?
If $n$ is small, the table for the binomial distribution should be used: Two sided: Check if $W$ observed in sample is in the rejection region or Find two sided $p$ value corresponding to observed $W$ and check if it is equal to or smaller than $\alpha$ Right sided: Check if $W$ observed in sample is in the rejection region or Find right sided $p$ value corresponding to observed $W$ and check if it is equal to or smaller than $\alpha$ Left sided: Check if $W$ observed in sample is in the rejection region or Find left sided $p$ value corresponding to observed $W$ and check if it is equal to or smaller than $\alpha$ If $n$ is large, the table for standard normal probabilities can be used: Two sided: Check if $z$ observed in sample is at least as extreme as critical value $z^$ or Find two sided $p$ value corresponding to observed $z$ and check if it is equal to or smaller than $\alpha$ Right sided: Check if $z$ observed in sample is equal to or larger than critical value $z^$ or Find right sided $p$ value corresponding to observed $z$ and check if it is equal to or smaller than $\alpha$ Left sided: Check if $z$ observed in sample is equal to or smaller than critical value $z^*$ or Find left sided $p$ value corresponding to observed $z$ and check if it is equal to or smaller than $\alpha$	If the number of blocks is large, the table with critical $X^2$ values can be used. If we denote $X^2 = Q$: Check if $X^2$ observed in sample is equal to or larger than critical value $X^{2*}$ or Find $p$ value corresponding to observed $X^2$ and check if it is equal to or smaller than $\alpha$	Check if $X^2$ observed in sample is equal to or larger than critical value $X^{2*}$ or Find $p$ value corresponding to observed $X^2$ and check if it is equal to or smaller than $\alpha$
Equivalent to	Equivalent to	n.a.
Two sided sign test is equivalent to McNemar's test: $W = b$, and $z^2 = X^2$ Friedman test with two related groups	Friedman test, with a categorical dependent variable consisting of two independent groups.	-
Example context	Example context	Example context
Do people tend to score higher on mental health after a mindfulness course?	Subjects perform three different tasks, which they can either perform correctly or incorrectly. Is there a difference in task performance between the three different tasks?	Is there an association between economic class and gender? Is the distribution of economic class different between men and women?
SPSS	SPSS	SPSS
Analyze > Nonparametric Tests > Legacy Dialogs > 2 Related Samples... Put the two paired variables in the boxes below Variable 1 and Variable 2 Under Test Type, select the Sign test	Analyze > Nonparametric Tests > Legacy Dialogs > K Related Samples... Put the $k$ variables containing the scores for the $k$ related groups in the white box below Test Variables Under Test Type, select Cochran's Q test	Analyze > Descriptive Statistics > Crosstabs... Put one of your two categorical variables in the box below Row(s), and the other categorical variable in the box below Column(s) Click the Statistics... button, and click on the square in front of Chi-square Continue and click OK
Jamovi	Jamovi	Jamovi
Jamovi does not have a specific option for the sign test. However, you can do the Friedman test instead. The $p$ value resulting from this Friedman test is equivalent to the two sided $p$ value that would have resulted from the sign test. Go to: ANOVA > Repeated Measures ANOVA - Friedman Put the two paired variables in the box below Measures	Jamovi does not have a specific option for the Cochran's Q test. However, you can do the Friedman test instead. The $p$ value resulting from this Friedman test is equivalent to the $p$ value that would have resulted from the Cochran's Q test. Go to: ANOVA > Repeated Measures ANOVA - Friedman Put the $k$ variables containing the scores for the $k$ related groups in the box below Measures	Frequencies > Independent Samples - $\chi^2$ test of association Put one of your two categorical variables in the box below Rows, and the other categorical variable in the box below Columns
Practice questions	Practice questions	Practice questions

Sign test - overview